Iran ju uz davno ma a neviem preco by to mal byt pruser. Uz X rokov dava “vyspely” zapad vsemozne najavo, ze pokial nejaku nemas, tak si krajina druhej kategorie a ak nebudes zit podla nasich predstav, tak s tebou velmi rychlo spravime poriadok a potom sa divime, ze sa o to krajiny ako Iran uspesne snazia.
citat z Coopra:
The IRGC’s argumentation further goes along these lines: ‘the civilised West’ doesn’t mind when Israel (actually, they’re using ‘Zionist Entity’) massacres 50,000 Palestinian in a year of ‘war on Hamas’ (not to talk about all those killed over the last 75-100 years), and that’s no ‘terror’, and is going to have 0 consequences for Israel? While, on the contrary, ‘the civilised West’ is supporting this massacre instigated by Israel, while damning their ‘Axis’ as ‘terrorist organisation’? Has the IRGC – whether in combination with- or without Hezbollah and Hamas – ever massacred 50,000 Israeli civilians? Are Palestinians, Iranians, and Lebanese worth less than the Israelis?
They see this way of thinking confirmed, time and again.
For example: in April this year, Israel bombed the IRGC… erm… ‘Iranian embassy’ in Damascus, killing a number of IRGC officers. Did ‘the West’ protest? Nope. It went as far as to declare that building ‘no embassy’.
However, when the IRGC wanted to retaliate against Israel, in April this year, all ‘the West’ – from Washington to Berlin – was on the phone to Tehran, demanding them not to hit back on Israel, ‘not to escalate’. Like if they were the first to do so. The IRGC is firmly convinced they were not (and, if you check Ronen Bergman’s The Secret War with Iran, he is in agreement).
Eventually, the IRGC did strike back, but ‘mildly’. ‘Just a bit’. In a rather ‘demonstrative’, than ‘we want blood’-fashion. They’ve announced their ‘strike’ hours in advance so that USA and Israel were able to ready their defences, and Israel suffered – according to its own claims – no damage. Immediately after, Tehran made it clear: this was the use of Article 51 of the UN Charter (see: ‘self-defence), and the affair is (quote) ‘concluded’. As explained back in April, the message was, ‘we’re happy: if you stop shooting at us, we’ll stop shooting at you’.
Did Netanyahu stop?
Of course he didn’t. Few days later, the IASF ‘hit back’ with air-launched ballistic missiles. Perhaps it caused some damage, but probably none at all. One way or the other, and once again, half ‘the West’ was on the telephone, calling Tehran not to escalate. Meanwhile, Israel happily went on killing Palestinians and then the Lebanese too, and ‘the West’ did nothing to stop this: on the contrary, most of ‘the West’ continued supplying arms and ammunition to Israel – so also when Netanyahu repeatedly sabotaged cease-fire negotiations through issuing ever additional demands…
With other words: the West ‘screwed us’ (the IRGC and the Axis… and Iran), once again…
https://xxtomcooperxx.substack.com/p/doctrinal-revisions